# Chat GPT Gov - Good or No Good?

**URL:** <https://www.fedwork.net/t/chat-gpt-gov-good-or-no-good/198>\
**Category:** Water Cooler Talk\
**Created:** [January 28, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://www.fedwork.net/t/chat-gpt-gov-good-or-no-good/198 "2025-01-28T22:40:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lindy.kyzer](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/www.fedwork.net/lindy.kyzer/32/321_2.png) [@lindy.kyzer](https://www.fedwork.net/u/lindy.kyzer)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://www.fedwork.net/t/chat-gpt-gov-good-or-no-good/198/1 "2025-01-28T22:40:46Z")

</div>

Is this going to be just like Zoom for Gov? If so, hard pass for me…[OpenAI launches ChatGPT Gov for U.S. government agencies](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/28/openai-launches-chatgpt-gov-for-us-government-agencies.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jhammy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/4da419/32.png) [@jhammy](https://www.fedwork.net/u/jhammy)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 2:43pm UTC](https://www.fedwork.net/t/chat-gpt-gov-good-or-no-good/198/2 "2025-01-31T14:43:42Z")

</div>

It’s fascinating to watch. As long as what’s put on the Chat GPT Gov has no way of getting to the main tool, then it’s good. I feel like it should look different than the regular version. I’d hate for human error to be what puts classified or sensitive material out on the internet. But it could be useful in driving efficiencies.